Originally posted by shaolin_Z
How convinient, king of like the FBI not revising the original list of original hijacker "suspects" after finding 4 or whatever number it was again, of them alive and well.
:rolleyes:
Dopey
quote:
Originally posted by Purple
culorut just ignore dopey..:)
:p
pkcRAISTLIN
quote:
Originally posted by culorut
Back on the subject.
Seems the BBC claims they have lost the original tapes after getting slammed.
All footage is archived and kept in a vault but this one goes missing on top of being pulled from google and youtube so ever quickly.
Caught with their pants down, very far down. Now lets find out who wired the BBC that WTC7 was going to collapse due to bull fires before it actually happened.
This is big, very BIG.
words cannot express just how ing stupid you are.
metalgearsolid
quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
words cannot express just how ing stupid you are.
Don't get offended. Its just an upset Aussie because the only threat to Australia are those damn kangoroos. You know they attack people?
pkcRAISTLIN
quote:
Originally posted by metalgearsolid
Don't get offended. Its just an upset Aussie because the only threat to Australia are those damn kangoroos. You know they attack people?
no, its an upset aussie that gets pissed off with morons that cant do research good enough to satisfy a highschool assignment. regurgitating fallacious crap that has been examined and dealt with 100 times :rolleyes:
metalgearsolid
I get kicks watching this:
culorut
quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
no, its an upset aussie that gets pissed off with morons that cant do research good enough to satisfy a highschool assignment. regurgitating fallacious crap that has been examined and dealt with 100 times :rolleyes:
Upset about an issue that was just discovered and not discussed a hundred times is more like it.
If you bothered to actually read through the links you would realize the BBC's reply to this now lost footage was only a day or two ago. This is far from re-hashing fallacious crap.
You seem to be the one that is full of it. Want some peanuts?
culorut
quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
words cannot express just how ing stupid you are.
The BBC have lost footage of one of the worlds most important events in the last 60 years. (sure they did)
Words cannot explain how stupid the general populace must be if they fall for "we lost the tapes" story again.
You are the ing idiot no doubt if you believe this bull.
pkcRAISTLIN
keep clinging to your fantasy world!
fight the power!
but feel free to explain this "issue" for us. just for a laugh. tell me, in your own words, exactly what the BBC has to do with any of this. im really keen to see how far your imagination is willing to go! hahahahahaha.
culorut
Clever another tinfoil hat picture trying to underline the message instead of arguing actual facts.
For one I do not think the BBC was in on it, they where reporting on what information was sent to them. What is important is they announced it (3-4 times) on live TV that WTC7 had collapsed almost half an hour before it actually happened. They had everything down to a tee regarding the collapse but it did not actually happen yet in real time.
Pretty mind ing blowing if you ask me.
Now where did the BBC get this info from and why has the archive footage been suddenly lost?
:eek:
pkcRAISTLIN
quote:
Originally posted by culorut
Pretty mind ing blowing if you ask me.
why is this any more mind blowing than any other mistaken report from that day (of which there were dozens).
quote:
Originally posted by culorut
Now where did the BBC get this info from and why has the archive footage been suddenly lost?
exactly. tell me where the BBC got the info from? give me a hint. coz honestly, youre making massive leaps of illogical faith. because the BBC reported something in error is not evidence of anything. you add far too much belief into a situation that actually requires FACTS. you have nothing to support your assertion that they knew beforehand that the government was going to detonate their supposed explosives.
and the FACT is everyone at the site knew WTC7 was going to collapse. if you bothered to read the fireman's quotes you would know this.
the simple explanation: someone from the BBC misunderstood info regarding the state of WTC7 and reported that the near-collapsing building had already collapsed. perhaps you can tell me why its so weird a building torn apart by debris and fire isnt expected to collapse after burning for 5+ ing hours :rolleyes:
culorut
Caught you red handed.
First try watching the clip moron. This footage shows the BBC announcing 3-4 times that WTC7 had collapsed, the last time they mention it in the clip they have live footage of WTC7 still standing in the ing background.
It is rather obvious they are reading from a script. If they bothered to look at the screen they would have seen the building was still standing.
There is huge difference between it has collapsed and we think it will collapse due to some petty fires.
They mention in great detail on how it happened on top of things.
The building did not collapse until 23 minutes after they reported it did. The archive tapes have gone missing, google and youtube pulled it faster than ben johnson on steriods but you still think everything is fine?
