|
Do you believe there is a U.S. government cover-up surrounding 9/11? (pg. 131)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| colonelcrisp |
| quote: | Originally posted by culorut
LOL!!!
Exactly why I do not take anything you say seriously, way to full of yourself. To say that architects have no practical knowledge of anything must be absolutely the most ignorant thing ever posted in this thread if not the whole forum, they design buildings you moron!
Might be just me (highly doubtful) but I think both PKC and Colonel are trying real hard to convince themselves that the lies they believe in are actually the truth. It comes across as very pathetic in their posts.
It must suck grasping to the twisted so called truth in their minds and trying to sway others on these forums that their mindset is the correct and only way to look at things.
Horrible. |
you do realize that architects don't do any structural design. they merely design the shape and function of buildings..... the concept if you will. structural engineering firms then take this "concept" and design each individual member and connection to make the concept work.
architects are great at drawing pictures and building cardboard models, but they know dick all about structural engineering |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by colonelcrisp
dont even get me started on architects........ i was going to tear into them in my previous post, but i didnt want to come accross as biased......
they have no practical knowledge of anything and im pretty sure they need assistance to wipe their own arse.....
the city just hired an architect to design a bridge........ it was a great looking thing and a nice design.... except i had to add 6 more supports for it to not fall down....... apparently in architect land they have 500 MPa concrete..... funny.... the strongest concrete you can get commercially from Lafarge or Esroc is 85 MPa..... and you pay out the ASS for it.. |
hahaha. yeah, i was going to ask you about the reliability of architects and their knowledge of structural collapses. having done a bit of tech drawing in my time, i certainly dont remember intense mathematics and structural loading components (though i will admit it wasn't something i studied all the way through school).
| quote: | Originally posted by culorut
LOL!!!
Exactly why I do not take anything you say seriously, way to full of yourself. To say that architects have no practical knowledge of anything must be absolutely the most ignorant thing ever posted in this thread if not the whole forum, they design buildings you moron! |
oh, so you're now saying you have more practical experience with architects than colonel does?? who's the being ignorant?
| quote: |
Might be just me (highly doubtful) but I think both PKC and Colonel are trying real hard to convince themselves that the lies they believe in are actually the truth. It comes across as very pathetic in their posts. |
i dont need to be "convinced" of anything. i am merely waiting for the first shred of evidence to vindicate the opinions of all the paranoid conspiracy morons (like yourself). we're not the ones kow-towing to junk science, discredited and imaginery engineers (serious lol at that!) in order to justify our feelings of fear and inadequacy!
| quote: |
It must suck grasping to the twisted so called truth in their minds and trying to sway others on these forums that their mindset is the correct and only way to look at things. |
not trying to convince anyone of anything. the members on this forum that i most respect in the PDD (with the notable exception of shaolin) all think you're a bunch of disingenuous idiots. feel free to read from the beginning of this thread troll, there used to be a lot more posters in here than there are now. everyone left because none of you can present plausible explanations to our questions, or you refuse to admit your non-sequiturs (like the empire state building) and merely shift the focus of the discussion someplace else. im only still here because i like laughing at you all, and your illogical trains of thought irritate my rationality.
keep posting your lists of made-up engineers to try and fool the ignorant that your position has some foundation outside of crazy nutjob "internet detectives" |
|
|
| culorut |
| quote: | you do realize that architects don't do any structural design. they merely design the shape and function of buildings..... the concept if you will. structural engineering firms then take this "concept" and design each individual member and connection to make the concept work.
architects are great at drawing pictures and building cardboard models, but they know dick all about structural engineering |
Let me guess you know the credentials and backgrounds of every architect on the planet?
Ignorance. Stop talking, you are hurting yourself really.
LOL |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by culorut
Let me guess you know the credentials and backgrounds of every architect on the planet? |
:haha::haha::haha::haha::haha::haha::haha:
says the guy that just posts names of imaginery "architects" and "engineers" without knowing anything about them at all. the cognitive dissonance displayed by those in this thread is truly remarkable.
its amazing how illogical these kids can be, and not even notice it! |
|
|
| culorut |
Here is an idea.
Why don't both you and Colonel setup a live debate with Richard Gage (the architect who runs www.ae911truth.org) and has countless seminars at prestige universities across North America and tape it.
Then post it here so we can have a good chuckle as he hands the both of you your asses.
You are both failing very badly at convincing the voters in this poll so at least think about taking a new direction with your nonsense. People are not so easily convinced at government and "official" accounts anymore and being on the short end of the stick it's up to you to prove to the people otherwise.
The more you guys stick around here the more you are going to lose in the numbers game. Judging by the way the poll numbers have moved lately you are both on the incorrect path.
It seems the majority sees right through the "official" story and the both of you. |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by culorut
Here is an idea.
Why don't both you and Colonel setup a live debate with Richard Gage (the architect who runs www.ae911truth.org) and has countless seminars at prestige universities across North America and tape it.
Then post it here so we can have a good chuckle as he hands the both of you your asses. |
LOL. cretinrot needs help from his idols. haha. i have no doubt that coloncrisp would thrash mr gage. and i would have no problems debating certain fallacies im sure he's repeating. just looking at that site, its full of bull. id just ask the same questions none of you fools seem to be capable of answering. haha.
| quote: |
You are both failing very badly at convincing the voters in this poll so at least think about taking a new direction with your nonsense. People are not so easily convinced at government and "official" accounts anymore and being on the short end of the stick it's up to you to prove to the people otherwise.
The more you guys stick around here the more you are going to lose in the numbers game. Judging by the way the poll numbers have moved lately you are both on the incorrect path.
It seems the majority sees right through the "official" story and the both of you. |
again, trancer-x, would you be so kind as to educate your younger, ignorant fool about logical fallacies and how he loves using them in a lot of his posts? :haha: |
|
|
| culorut |
Excellent article, hit the link below to view it in it's entirety with pictures.
The Seventh Tower
Niels Harrit has been Associate Professor at the Department of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen, for 37 years. This is a translation of a feature article printed in the Danish Newspaper, Information, on 31 March 2007 (requires subscription). Images have been added below to support the text.
How, not why, did World War Three start?
We are not talking about conspiracy theories, absolutely not. We are talking about elementary physics and chemical processes, Newton's laws, gravity, the melting point of steel, and the like.
The World Trade Center was a complex made up of several buildings. The best-known, of course, were the two towers, WTC1 and WTC2. Together with five other smaller buildings – numbered 3, 4, 5 and 6 – they formed a perimeter around a central plaza. On the far side of building 6, over 100 metres from the North Tower (WTC1), was building seven (WTC7). It was a very large 47-storey office building.
The two towers collapsed on 11 September 2001, after each was struck by an airplane. Everyone on the globe who had access to a television set has seen the dramatic and tragic images. However, to this day, only very few people are aware of the existence of WTC7 or its fate. This building was not hit by any airplane, but still collapsed seven hours after the towers. This feature article is about that event.
http://www.911truth.dk/first/en/art_Harrit.htm |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by culorut
Excellent article, hit the link below to view it in it's entirety with pictures.
The Seventh Tower
Niels Harrit has been Associate Professor at the Department of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen, for 37 years. This is a translation of a feature article printed in the Danish Newspaper, Information, on 31 March 2007 (requires subscription). Images have been added below to support the text.
How, not why, did World War Three start?
We are not talking about conspiracy theories, absolutely not. We are talking about elementary physics and chemical processes, Newton's laws, gravity, the melting point of steel, and the like.
The World Trade Center was a complex made up of several buildings. The best-known, of course, were the two towers, WTC1 and WTC2. Together with five other smaller buildings – numbered 3, 4, 5 and 6 – they formed a perimeter around a central plaza. On the far side of building 6, over 100 metres from the North Tower (WTC1), was building seven (WTC7). It was a very large 47-storey office building.
The two towers collapsed on 11 September 2001, after each was struck by an airplane. Everyone on the globe who had access to a television set has seen the dramatic and tragic images. However, to this day, only very few people are aware of the existence of WTC7 or its fate. This building was not hit by any airplane, but still collapsed seven hours after the towers. This feature article is about that event.
http://www.911truth.dk/first/en/art_Harrit.htm |
the same, tired old fallacies being trotted out by someone new. woohoo! great article, shows that the troof movement is merely repeating itself. good work.
i especially love the old technique of comparing the WTCs to other buildings that have nothing in common with them. good work there internet detective!! :haha: |
|
|
| colonelcrisp |
| quote: | Originally posted by culorut
Let me guess you know the credentials and backgrounds of every architect on the planet?
Ignorance. Stop talking, you are hurting yourself really.
LOL |
as i said above, i did not look into the validity of their architecture liscences as myself and the rest of the engineering community do not consider them competant in the field of structural engineering.
and as far as checking the liscensure of the "engineers" you listed, i didnt pull that data out of my magical black hat. its all public record and you can get the data from your state engineering board website. same as it is here in canada.... www.peo.on.ca is my liscencing board.
i have yet to see a propper peer reviewed document outlining these theories.... and until then. they are all baseless |
|
|
| ogvh5150 |
| quote: | Originally posted by ogvh5150
|
|
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| ^^ big ing deal. |
|
|
| colonelcrisp |
| quote: | Originally posted by ogvh5150
|
and CNN is a reliable news source.........rrrrrrright....
actually i saw the same kind of poll on CNN before except it was % of CNN viewers who thought JFK and Elvis were still alive........ |
|
|
|
|
