|
Do you believe there is a U.S. government cover-up surrounding 9/11? (pg. 321)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| cronodevir |
No Krypton, you believe Osama bin Laden told his men to brainwash and pay 1 million dollars to two arabs to hijack 4 planes and fly them into the trade center.
And you are an admitted racist. |
|
|
| Krypton |
| quote: | Originally posted by cronodevir
No Krypton, you believe Osama bin Laden told his men to brainwash and pay 1 million dollars to two arabs to hijack 4 planes and fly them into the trade center. |
No, I just think your beliefs are pure .
| quote: | | And you are an admitted racist. |
I am racist against idiots such as yourself. You got me there... |
|
|
| cronodevir |
| No, actually you are a 'color of their skin' racist. |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by cronodevir
No Krypton, you believe Osama bin Laden told his men to brainwash and pay 1 million dollars to two arabs to hijack 4 planes and fly them into the trade center. |
must really stick in your craw that osama and his buddies have repeatedly taken responsibility for the attacks. |
|
|
| cronodevir |
| Not really, I find the specifics of who did it irrelevent, the aftermath of the event and the following years is proof enough who was behind it. Those with power will do as they can. And thinking that those in power have any reguard for a lowly citizens life is naieve at best. |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by cronodevir
Not really, I find the specifics of who did it irrelevent, the aftermath of the event and the following years is proof enough who was behind it. |
well, at least you're upfront about your logic making absolutely no sense. |
|
|
| cronodevir |
Its called speculation, and the use of a mathmatical peice called probability. Its pretty logical to conclude that when an event happens, and someone gains a major advantage from it, that said event was caused in part by the one who gained the advantage.. not always, but a lot of the times.
If you cannot make the connection of how 9/11 helped Ameirca invade the middle east, then why are you even on a forum? Most things will be over your head. |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by cronodevir
Its pretty logical |
hahahaha.
no, its not. what is logical is to make conclusions on actual evidence, not on your primary-school understanding of politics.
your gut instinct doesn't quite cut it :stongue: |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by cronodevir
There is no evidence to suggest they ever had any.
Lol damn, these niggas believe in evolution. Some people will blindly believe the craziest stuff with utterly no logic or evidence to back up their views.
Stay tuned in folks, dumbasses will speak again soon enough. |
lols. |
|
|
| jerZ07002 |
| quote: | Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
lols. |
this one is pretty good also. crono is explaining the scientific method of preserving history through 'word of mouth' lo-ing-l
| quote: | Originally posted by cronodevir
When your view is wrong, why do I need an open mind to say "it might be true"? I know its wrong, only a fool would accept something known to be wrong as truth.
The muslims have a scientific method for preserving information Its based on chains of narration, who told who told who told who, and what is the indepth biagraphy of each individual in that chain? How many chains are there? How many people have chains? How many chains do they have? Are all questions that must be answered before a judgement is made on a peice of information.
What do you have? Someone wrote it in a book, and that book goes through several hundred revisions over the years. There isn't even a method in the west for preserving information, percausions are not even made. The information is written down and thrown into a file somewhere and forgotten. And not only that, the only palces you CAN get information is from one or two shifty sources. Whom you don't even know. Look at an encyclopedia...do you know who wrote it? Where did they get their information? What are the biographies of those who transmitted that information? Did the information get translated from one language to another? Did many scholars go over that translation and confirm that its meaning is intact? ...no, you have none of that. You have wikipedia. And a bunch of papers written by people who went to "school" for it therefor you blindly accept their broad statements as utterly true.
You cannot even name one person bewteen now and Plato who transmitted the information he said. You know that plato existed at a certain time because some book, written by someone you don't know, said so. IF you even learned it from a book, and not some random website wirtten by anon.
Reliable source? Meaning any source that has your point of view, no doubt. |
|
|
|
|
|
