|
Do you believe there is a U.S. government cover-up surrounding 9/11? (pg. 268)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Krypton |
| quote: | Originally posted by {b.s.e.}
Fire falls now? :conf: New physics being discovered daily! Scientists must be ting in their socks.
Let alone take into consideration that that portion of the building should have been the only piece to fall in that situation. How does the Pancake Theory explain that collapse at all? |
LOL, wow, so the explosives team set their explosives right at the impact zone. Wow. :haha: You don't even know who set the explosives, let alone, provide any evidence of explosives apart from subjective evidence.
Additionally, the trusses supporting each floor could easily have been destroyed in the fact that each truss was secured by TWO, yes TWO, bolts for each truss. With thousands of ton of avalanching pressure on two measily bolts, it's no wonder the entire building fell. |
|
|
| culorut |
Collapsed buildings look like this,
They don't blow up and pulverize, it does not happen and has never in history.
You must like believing in fairy tales. |
|
|
| Krypton |
| quote: | Originally posted by culorut
Collapsed buildings look like this,
They don't blow up and pulverize, it does not happen and has never in history.
You must like believing in fairy tales. |
Are those high rise steel structures burned from the inside out by fire, and pulverized by jet airliners? Didn't think so...:rolleyes:
You're paranoid conspiracies are far worse than even the most childish fairy tale...idiot...;) |
|
|
| culorut |
| quote: | | Are those high rise steel structures burned from the inside out by fire, and pulverized by jet airliners? Didn't think so... |
Burned inside out from fires? Pulverized from airliners? :rolleyes:
You are so far out of whack it's not even funny. The firefighters themselves said the fires where practically out and if you think the impact of airliners pulverized the buildings you are the biggest ing idiot in the world.
This is an demo/explosion not a collapse.
 |
|
|
| Krypton |
| quote: | Originally posted by culorut
Burned inside out from fires? Pulverized from airliners? :rolleyes:
You are so far out of whack it's not even funny. The firefighters themselves said the fires where practically out and if you think the impact of airliners pulverized the buildings you are the biggest ing idiot in the world.
This is an demo/explosion not a collapse.
|
Now, you're just making stuff up, and we call that lying. You'de probably be good at writing children's books...;)
Sure looks like a fire to me, on several floors. Oh, let's not forget the massive damage from the jet liner impact itself, which destroyed key supports for the building. Your sad attempt to compare buildings, which we don't even know are steel, nor had a huge jet fueled fire on multiple floors, and a devastating collision, to the WTC collapse is LAUGHABLE...:haha: :haha: :haha:
And once again, all of you fail to make a coherent case. No suspects, no circumstantial evidence, no nothing. All you do is repeat the same thing, over and over and over and over...again and again. I guess you guys take to heart, "If you repeat a lie enough times, people believe it."
7 years on, nobodies been prosecuted for treason. |
|
|
| Trancer-X |
| quote: | Originally posted by culorut
Burned inside out from fires? Pulverized from airliners? :rolleyes:
You are so far out of whack it's not even funny. The firefighters themselves said the fires where practically out and if you think the impact of airliners pulverized the buildings you are the biggest ing idiot in the world.
This is an demo/explosion not a collapse.
|
I think that's much of the reason why I gave up on that kid ever figuring any of this out. He's so far gone that even if Dick Cheney himself came out and said the he in fact was behind it, Krypton would undoubtedly try to argue against him from every single angle. Well, either that or he'd just blow his own brains out as a result of his not being able to cope with his inadequately perceived reality becoming so thoroughly shattered.
The fact that these trolls categorically deny eyewitness accounts such as these (which I have no doubt were purposefully omitted from the official report) is telling enough as it is that these folks are either in an absolute state of denial or are in fact working in the effort to help extend the criminal coverup surrounding the events of that day. |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by Trancer-X
I think that's much of the reason why I gave up on that kid ever figuring any of this out. He's so far gone that even if Dick Cheney himself came out and said the he in fact was behind it, Krypton would undoubtedly try to argue against him from every single angle. Well, either that or he'd just blow his own brains out as a result of his not being able to cope with his inadequately perceived reality becoming so thoroughly shattered.
The fact that these trolls categorically deny eyewitness accounts such as these (which I have no doubt were purposefully omitted from the official report) is telling enough as it is that these folks are either in an absolute state of denial or are in fact working in the effort to help extend the criminal coverup surrounding the events of that day. |
if its so ing obvious why has no one in your beloved movement been able to explain the collapses with nice, cold numbers? not a single engineering paper with which to challenge reality.
i cant but help laughing at how much time you've wasted on this . priceless! :stongue: |
|
|
| jerZ07002 |
seriously nuts, i used to have a view of the WTC from my front porch until the day several members of my family witnessed with their own eyes, from my front window, two planes slamming into those buildings. it's easy to drum up theories when your dumb ass is in texas or where ever the hell you're from. |
|
|
| jerZ07002 |
| quote: | Originally posted by culorut
Collapsed buildings look like this,
They don't blow up and pulverize, it does not happen and has never in history.
You must like believing in fairy tales. |
did you happen to notice those buildings were concrete slab buildings? also, did you notice that not one of those buildings had a ing 737 lodged near the top? |
|
|
| Trancer-X |
Wow, the trolls are making it easy for me today. lol
 |
|
|
| Trancer-X |
The 9/11 widows know what's up. They tenaciously fought to establish an investigation in the first place and when one was finally conducted they came to the painful realization that it didn't even seek to hold anyone accountable for the tragedies of that day.
IMO, it was simply another whitewash.
| quote: | Group of 9/11 widows 'question the veracity of the entire Commission’s report'
Ron Brynaert
Published: Friday August 4, 2006
Four widows instrumental in getting Congress to push President Bush to create the 9/11 Independent Commission are insisting that it "failed in its duties" on the heels of two recent news reports which allege that some commissioners knew they were being "deceived" by NORAD officials, and the widows are now questioning "the veracity of the entire Commission’s report," RAW STORY has found.
In a statement released today by Patty Casazza, Monica Gabrielle, Mindy Kleinberg, and Lorie Van Auken - 1/3 of the Family Steering Committee for the 9/11 Independent Commission - the widows refer to the commission's mandate (Section 602 of Public Law 107-306).
Two of the five "purposes of the Commission" were to "ascertain, evaluate, and report on the evidence developed by all relevant governmental agencies regarding the facts and circumstances surrounding the attacks" and "make a full and complete accounting of the circumstances surrounding the attacks, and the extent of the United States' preparedness for, and immediate response to, the attacks."
"Recent stories in the Washington Post, the New York Times, as well as the release of the transcripts of the NORAD tapes in Vanity Fair, clearly show that the 9/11 Commission failed in its duties," says the widows' statement.
"Some staff members and commissioners of the Sept. 11 panel concluded that the Pentagon's initial story of how it reacted to the 2001 terrorist attacks may have been part of a deliberate effort to mislead the commission and the public rather than a reflection of the fog of events on that day, according to sources involved in the debate," reported Dan Eggan for The Washington Post.
"As one of its last acts before disbanding, in July 2004, the 9/11 commission made referrals to the inspector general's offices of both the Department of Transportation (which includes the F.A.A.) and the Defense Department to further investigate whether witnesses had lied," wrote Michael Bronner for Vanity Fair.
In light of these reports, the 9/11 widows "question the veracity of the entire Commission’s report."
"The fact that the Commission did not see fit to tie up all loose ends in their final report or to hold those who came before them accountable for lying and/or making misleading statements puts into question the veracity of the entire Commission’s report," the widows write.
"Furthermore, the lack of tenacity and curiosity, by the Commissioners themselves, to determine why NORAD had deceived them is unconscionable," the statement continues. "Knowing full well that the lack of military response was such a critical failure, begs the question of whether that same lack of tenacity and curiosity was applied to other critical areas of the 9/11 investigation."
According to the widows' statement, "the failure to fully and properly investigate all areas, not follow all leads and not address the need for accountability, whether it be bureaucrats lying at a hearing or personnel with questionable performance of assigned duties, continues to leave this Nation and its citizens vulnerable and at risk."
"The 9/11 Commission was derelict in its duties," the statement continues.
"What we needed from them was a thorough investigation into the events of September 11th."
"Inexcusably, five years later, we still do," the statement ends.
http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/G...ndent_0804.html |
|
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| who gives a what the widows think? |
|
|
|
|
