|
Do you believe there is a U.S. government cover-up surrounding 9/11? (pg. 75)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| shaolin_Z |
| Grammatical/Spelling errors get the best of him :p. |
|
|
| ogvh5150 |
culorut + shaolin_Z:
+1
Short form:
He gives credence to this thread by responding.
What he should do is call Langley for his paycheck. Unless he likes working for free. |
|
|
| Magnetonium |
| quote: | Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
prove to me theres more video you clown. i love it how you guys make these assumptions, based on NOTHING as if its evidence :rolleyes: nobody has said theres any more video other than you crazy ******s.
where did the plan wreckage come from?
what did the hundreds of witnesses really see?
where did the dead bodies come from?
the personal effects?
what knocked down the street lights on the approach vector?
where are the passengers from the flight?
where is the plane?
you ignore all these sensible questions in favour of some half-baked idea that the video shown isnt good enough.
shaolin, THIS is why the 911 movement gets me so riled up. what a load of bull. |
I am not going down that road again. My whole point is, when I have an argument against the government, and the government is the one in control of the information and facts I am looking for. There were many camera pointing at the Pentagon to take a good video of the attack, yet none of them were released - actually, the video tapes were seized and we havent seen them. And the impact whole is too small to fit the plane. I guess Houdini hid the plane ;-) And planes dont have chemtrails at low attitudes of 5 metres.
EDIT: The photos links cannot be hotlinked. Oh well, 'em.
These are enough evidence to show there was no plane hitting the Pentagon:
http://911research.wtc7.net/pentago.../uncropped.html
^^^ Planes dont do chemtrails at low altitudes. But missiles do ;-) |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by Magnetonium
[COLOR=FF7F50]
I am not going down that road again. |
meaning you dont have ANY answers to questions that you should have readily at hand, before you go off ranting with paranoid delusions. if you cant muster a logical, compelling & reasonable case to answer my questions above, then this again shows shaolin why i get so annoyed with the 9/11 movement. you cherry pick your so-called "facts" whilst ignoring all the illogical by-products such "facts" raise.
| quote: |
There were many camera pointing at the Pentagon to take a good video of the attack, yet none of them were released |
ill just take your word for this shall i? :rolleyes: |
|
|
| Magnetonium |
| quote: | Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
meaning you dont have ANY answers to questions that you should have readily at hand, before you go off ranting with paranoid delusions. if you cant muster a logical, compelling & reasonable case to answer my questions above, then this again shows shaolin why i get so annoyed with the 9/11 movement. you cherry pick your so-called "facts" whilst ignoring all the illogical by-products such "facts" raise.
ill just take your word for this shall i? :rolleyes: |
With regards to the alleged video released by Pentagon - this is not a video footage. Its five frames of a video. Amazingly enough, they fail to show the actual plane, and the chemtrails following the alleged plane actually implicate the government even more. Its easy to have witnesses claiming to have been the place. These people, government agents, could have easily been there before the attack to make sure that they could claim plane hit the building. Dont forget, this was planned out, and the fact that terrorists attacked while terrorist drills were going on is quite interesting as well. I dont need any demolition experts on this, because Pentagon government evidence, or lack of it that is, is overwhelming. Chemtrails dont form on passenger planes at altitudes of 5-10 metres!!! |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by Magnetonium
With regards to the alleged video released by Pentagon - this is not a video footage. Its five frames of a video. Amazingly enough, they fail to show the actual plane, and the chemtrails following the alleged plane actually implicate the government even more. Its easy to have witnesses claiming to have been the place. These people, government agents, could have easily been there before the attack to make sure that they could claim plane hit the building. Dont forget, this was planned out, and the fact that terrorists attacked while terrorist drills were going on is quite interesting as well. I dont need any demolition experts on this, because Pentagon government evidence, or lack of it that is, is overwhelming. Chemtrails dont form on passenger planes at altitudes of 5-10 metres!!! |
not answering any of my questions. nor have you provided any evidence that there are any more videos. nor have you answered why the hundreds of MOTORISTS are wrong when they saw the plane hitting the building :rolleyes: your answer to everything is more "government agents". its your panacea for all the massive holes in your delusions.
answer my point by point questions or shut the hell up. |
|
|
| Magnetonium |
Those were press reports. Like press did any fair coverage at all. They didnt say almost anything about the commission report either on its ommissions and stuff. Media is bull.
I read how some motorists heard some plane-like noise and some witnesses said they saw something that looked like a SMALL PLANE. Trust me, a passenger plane flying at 10 metres above the ground would have nearly deafened the drivers. I had a picture somewhere of the poles still standing after initial attack, but later they were down. Too bad there were no parts of the plane's wings beside the bent poles ;-)
It doesnt matter, there's no point arguing you, I already stated my point, and so did you. You're too obsessed with this topic. Try occupying your time with something more useful. :D
As for the Pentagon agents scooping up small debris and pieces of evidence, that hardly appear like any Boeing 747 parts, especially that 5mm thin alleged metal cover part of the plane that the agent easily held up using one hand. It was all small pieces. Boeing 747 on the other hand is covered by a thick heavy components to withstand the load at high altitudes.:stongue: |
|
|
| culorut |
It has been yanked from google and youtube already, watch or save the video now before it gets deleted permanently.
BBC reporting WTC7 collapsed 23 minutes before it actually happened,
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=49f_1172526096&p=1
Seems like they simply let the scripted info out a little to early on live TV, I wonder where they received their intel from? |
|
|
| culorut |
| quote: | | Go stick it in with the rest of them- |
Go ahead and do so if you want, this topic easily deserves it's own thread though. |
|
|
| Dopey |
| quote: | Originally posted by culorut
Go ahead and do so if you want, this topic easily deserves it's own thread though. |
it really doesn't:eyes: |
|
|
|
|
