|
Do you believe there is a U.S. government cover-up surrounding 9/11? (pg. 5)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| skot_e |
Flash movie
My brotha sent me this a while back. It has various photos of the pentagon. It argues there is a conspiracy/cover-up.
i am not so sure about NYC attacks, they seem more likely to have been real, but the Pentagon? Where is the missing plane? |
|
|
| ogvh5150 |
| quote: | Originally posted by Fir3start3r
The fact of the matter is....they DID fall... |
The keyword he asked was WHY.
It's obvious they fell. |
|
|
| Trancer-X |
| quote: | Originally posted by skot_e
Flash movie
My brotha sent me this a while back. It has various photos of the pentagon. It argues there is a conspiracy/cover-up.
i am not so sure about NYC attacks, they seem more likely to have been real, but the Pentagon? Where is the missing plane? |
Unfortunately, things have been so obfuscated that we may never know what the real truth is.
The fact is that most real conspiracies are followed by disinformation campaigns which help to muddy the waters in the effort to stifle proper investigation.
| quote: | A honey pot, in intelligence jargon, is a tempting source of information or 'dangle' that is set out to lure intended victims into a trap. Ultimately the honey pot is violently and maliciously discredited so as to destroy the credibility of anything stuck to it by association.
- Michael Ruppert, Crossing the Rubicon, p. 184 |
|
|
|
| Fir3start3r |
| quote: | Originally posted by ogvh5150
The keyword he asked was WHY.
It's obvious they fell. |
There are a million reasons/theories but none larger than hate. |
|
|
| Trancer-X |
| quote: | Originally posted by ogvh5150
The keyword he asked was WHY.
It's obvious they fell. |
I wasn't even going to bother answering such a foolish post. |
|
|
| ogvh5150 |
| quote: | Originally posted by Fir3start3r
There are a million reasons/theories but none larger than hate. |
I thought the official conclusion was that jet fuel brought those buildings down. But if you beg to differ I suppose hate has become a law of physics that has yet to be discovered or become explainable. If you can offer a formulaic approach as to how hate figures into the equation involving gravity, by all means enlighten us. |
|
|
| LazFX |
| quote: | Originally posted by donnybrasco
So a missle was timed to strike WTC 6 at the exact same moment that the South Tower was being struck by a plane?
Amazing! It's all so clear to me now!! Why didn't I see the obvious before? Better yet; Why hasn't everyone, in a city of tens-of-thousands, reported seeing this missle as well? Well who cares; I'm a convert!!
When do I get my free gift?vvv
 |
Thats a cool clock, if i was to drop my IQ to the level of a slug, then maybe I would beleive that the gov had something to do with 9/11
but just so that you all will not think I am totally blinded, I do beleive that the present Administration used 9/11 to increase its hold on the nation, to lie and cheat to take the US to an ill fought war.
so |
|
|
| Fir3start3r |
| quote: | Originally posted by ogvh5150
I thought the official conclusion was that jet fuel brought those buildings down. But if you beg to differ I suppose hate has become a law of physics that has yet to be discovered or become explainable. If you can offer a formulaic approach as to how hate figures into the equation involving gravity, by all means enlighten us. |
Scuse me for being so abstract, but let's not suggest aloofness when there has been many posts regarding the subject at hand already. (That would be aloofness ;))
I do accept the official conclusion to answer your question however.
My suggestion of, 'hate' wasn't some enigmatic theory to the cause of the towers collapse as been suggested. It was more referring more to the undercurrent that lead to the act in the first place.
Of course the real reasons are as varied as the scientific reasoning and theories of the towers physical demise but I thought it pretty safe to suggest such a thing.
Sorry I lost yea on that one... :p |
|
|
| ogvh5150 |
| I would have just said I spoke in allegory. |
|
|
| Fir3start3r |
| quote: | Originally posted by ogvh5150
I would have just said I spoke in allegory. |
I could have too. ;) |
|
|
| ogvh5150 |
| quote: | Originally posted by Trancer-X
I wasn't even going to bother answering such a foolish post. |
Even fools should be given the benefit of doubt. After all we did believe the gov't at one point in our lives.
Some people will always believe the shadows on the cave wall are all the reality they know. |
|
|
| ogvh5150 |
| quote: |
- How did a fire fed by jet fuel, which at most burns at 1,700 degrees Fahrenheit, cause the collapse of the Twin Towers, built of steel that melts at 2,800 degrees? (Most experts agree that the impact of airliners, made mostly of lightweight aluminum, should not have been enough alone to cause structural failure.) How could a single planeload of burning jet fuel -- most of which flared off in the initial fireball -- cause the South World Trade Center tower to collapse in just 56 minutes?
- Why did building WTC-7 fall, though no aircraft struck it? Fire alone had never before caused a steel skyscraper to collapse.
- Why did all three buildings collapse largely into their own footprints -- in the style of a controlled demolition
- Why did no U.S. military jet intercept the wayward aircraft?
- Why has there been no investigation of BBC reports that five of the alleged 9/11 hijackers were alive and accounted for after the event?
|
Avoiding the hard questions (A Miami Herald dot com article) |
|
|
|
|
