return to tranceaddict TranceAddict Forums Archive > Other > Political Discussion / Debate

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 [237] 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 
Do you believe there is a U.S. government cover-up surrounding 9/11? (pg. 237)
View this Thread in Original format
XaNaX
quote:
Originally posted by Trancer-X
What are these baseless claims that you speak of? Care to elaborate?

I think that perhaps you should take a good look at the hypocrisy of your own words. In just about every one of your posts you blindly defend the indefensible so how else do you think that I would perceive you besides being some cowardly shill for a murderously hawkish and corrupt administration. If you really thought that what I've been posting or saying on here is so ludicrous then why would you feel such a need to resort to personal attacks and underhanded insinuations in the attempt to defame me? Why not try to refute the points which have been brought up? BECAUSE YOU CAN'T!!


Hmmm how about your claims that WTC7 was blown up and that the Pentagon was struck by something other than Flight 77. You are right, I don't really need to defame you, your posts in this thread speak for themselves.

quote:
Originally posted by Trancer-X
If you really thought that I was full of crap and offered no evidence about 9/11 then you would be able to simply leave me alone but no, you're stuck in this thread like white on rice. I saw how you did the same thing to Colurut and now you're doing it to me, something I pretty much expected.


Well the two of you use the same taticts in trolling this thread, it is only natural that I respond to both of you in the same way. Like I said, I'm retiring from this thread. After I leave work today I'll not even view it again.
culorut
Hilarious, Trancer-X posts facts after more facts including people who where actually at ground zero during 9/11 and the usual trolls just come back with insults and nothing to back them up.

Figures, if you cannot debunk the reality of it better to call someone an ass clown.

LOL



trolls.
dcougar99
quote:
Originally posted by culorut
Hilarious, Trancer-X posts facts after more facts including people who where actually at ground zero during 9/11 and the usual trolls just come back with insults and nothing to back them up.

Figures, if you cannot debunk the reality of it better to call someone an ass clown.

LOL



trolls.



you got that right!
{b.s.e.}
quote:
Originally posted by XaNaX
Hmmm how about your claims that WTC7 was blown up and that the Pentagon was struck by something other than Flight 77. You are right, I don't really need to defame you, your posts in this thread speak for themselves.



Well the two of you use the same taticts in trolling this thread, it is only natural that I respond to both of you in the same way. Like I said, I'm retiring from this thread. After I leave work today I'll not even view it again.


That aside, you're wrong. Would you like to see the list of people with PhDs that disagree with your rodent-like reasoning?

http://www.wanttoknow.info/070618professorsquestion911

Karen Johnson says it all perfectly. If you can listen to what she says and still cling to the Official Story, you're well beyond help.
{b.s.e.}
Interesting to note that the towers were insulated with asbestos.

...now, how could that be solved? a lengthy, very expensive renovation?

...:wtf:
Moongoose
Of course, Economy 101 really, if you cant afford to renovate a building fly a plane into it and blow it up. Much less hassle to clean up all the debris and those few thousand dead bodies than to remove all the asbestos.
{b.s.e.}
and the contract to build a bigger one. :P

really, i was being facetious.
jerZ07002
quote:
Originally posted by {b.s.e.}
Interesting to note that the towers were insulated with asbestos.



so is every other building built in NYC (and most parts of the country) in the 60s and 70s.

this thread needs to die!!!
{b.s.e.}
quote:
Originally posted by jerZ07002
so is every other building built in NYC (and most parts of the country) in the 60s and 70s.

this thread needs to die!!!


f-a-c-e-t-i-o-u-s

and, agreed.
noikeee
I just clicked on this poll's results for the first time ever and noticed "yes" is winning by a decent margin.

:wtf: :wtf: :wtf:

Trancer-X
quote:
Originally posted by noikeee
I just clicked on this poll's results for the first time ever and noticed "yes" is winning by a decent margin.

:wtf: :wtf: :wtf:


Not too far off from the AOL poll I saw a few weeks ago.

{b.s.e.}
quote:
Originally posted by Moongoose
Of course, Economy 101 really, if you cant afford to renovate a building fly a plane into it and blow it up. Much less hassle to clean up all the debris and those few thousand dead bodies than to remove all the asbestos.


note: the Port Authority was seeking approval to demolish it, but were rescinded due the asbestos.
:clown:

lol, 37000 and change. It's quite obvious that it's not as it appears to be, regardless of skepticism.
CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 [237] 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 
Privacy Statement