|
Do you believe there is a U.S. government cover-up surrounding 9/11? (pg. 184)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by {b.s.e.}
man, why are you making me spell it out for you?
 |
, not again. the main reason he looks different is the transition between NTSC and PAL formats. christ, the way you kids believe everything you read on the net pisses me off. search through this thread, i have already pasted an analysis on the videotapes of bin laden. |
|
|
| Q5echo |
that video wants you to believe that the "official, Bush administration story" was that only fire brought down building 7, when in reality the official story is that fire+structural damage+unusual construction brought the building down.
they (being the producers of that video) got you to believe something that is not true at all. |
|
|
| {b.s.e.} |
| quote: | Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
, not again. the main reason he looks different is the transition between NTSC and PAL formats. christ, the way you kids believe everything you read on the net pisses me off. search through this thread, i have already pasted an analysis on the videotapes of bin laden. |
great. i'm not a kid. get over yourself. :wtf:
Larry Silverstein has admitted to giving the go ahead to demolish WTC 7, and if I'm not mistaken all three buildings fell in very similar ways. |
|
|
| Q5echo |
| quote: | Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
blah blah blah NTSC and PAL formats. |
nerd;) |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by {b.s.e.}
great. i'm not a kid. get over yourself. :wtf: |
sorry, i merely presumed only those of a young age (and inexperience) would fall for the truther techniques of "research". alas, i am mistaken.
| quote: | Originally posted by {b.s.e.}
Larry Silverstein has admitted to giving the go ahead to demolish WTC 7 |
no he didnt, he also has NO authority on how emergency responders reacted to anything. that's just a stupid notion.
| quote: | Originally posted by {b.s.e.}
and if I'm not mistaken all three buildings fell in very similar ways. |
you ARE mistaken. the collapse of WTC7 was fundamentally different to 1 & 2. :rolleyes:
| quote: | Originally posted by Q5echo
nerd;) |
haha! its not my fault! :D |
|
|
| jerZ07002 |
| quote: | Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
no he didnt, he also has NO authority on how emergency responders reacted to anything. that's just a stupid notion.
|
plus his lease agreement didn't allow him to demolish the building. |
|
|
| {b.s.e.} |
| quote: | Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
you ARE mistaken. the collapse of WTC7 was fundamentally different to 1 & 2. :rolleyes:
|
Explain further please. It's so easy to say someone is wrong, it takes effort to actually explain the difference. |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by {b.s.e.}
Explain further please. It's so easy to say someone is wrong, it takes effort to actually explain the difference. |
towers 1 and 2 collapsed from the top down, WTC7 appears to collapse from the bottom up. |
|
|
| culorut |
| quote: | | WTC7 appears to collapse from the bottom up. |
It does not look that way all. The Penthouse caves in before the bottom gives out.
Controlled demolition more like it. The supports gave way at the same time, no fire can do that to a building.
The NIST had to remove the supports in their model in order for WTC7 to collapse otherwise they could not prove .
Find another building that has been brought down due to fire and I will give you 911 BILLION DOLLARS! |
|
|
| {b.s.e.} |
taken from Scholars for the Truth.
(3) UL certified the steel in the buildings up to 2,000*F for at least six hoursbefore it would even significantly weaken, where these fires burned too low andtoo briefly--about one hour in the South Tower and one and a half in theNorth--to have even caused the steel to weaken, much less melt;
(7) the destruction of the South Tower in 10 seconds and of the North in 11 iseven faster than free fall with only air resistance, which would have taken 12seconds, which, as Judy Wood (Ph.d in mechanical engineering) has emphaized, is an astounding result that wouldhave been impossible without extremely powerful explosives;
More on Dr. Wood, if you find her point trivial against some mainstream proponent of disinformatin.
http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/Wood_Bio.html |
|
|
| Q5echo |
| quote: | Originally posted by {b.s.e.}
(3) UL certified the steel in the buildings up to 2,000*F for at least six hoursbefore it would even significantly weaken |
read, then think about what you just accepted as "truth".
2000*F at 6 hours? think about that for a minute. |
|
|
|
|
