|
Do you believe there is a U.S. government cover-up surrounding 9/11? (pg. 124)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by shaolin_Z
Even my aquaintances in the OTO, Golden Dawn, and the handful of masons I know admit 9-11 was an inside job. LOL, you guys are ing retarded.  |
i want what youre smoking shaolin! :stongue: |
|
|
| hardcore trancer |
Have you guys seen this movie called ZEITGEIST? I watched it a few days ago,lots of interesting points,but most of them have been told by many others in the past.I liked the part 3 of the movie myself the most.
Anyways here is the link:
[[ LINK REMOVED ]]
|
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by hardcore trancer
Have you guys seen this movie called ZEITGEIST? I watched it a few days ago,lots of interesting points,but most of them have been told by many others in the past.I liked the part 3 of the movie myself the most.
Anyways here is the link:
[[ LINK REMOVED ]]
|
i read the synopsis a week or two ago. full of the repetitive fallacies that characterise the "truth" movement. |
|
|
| shaolin_Z |
| quote: | Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
i want what youre smoking shaolin! :stongue: |
CIA imported crack!  |
|
|
| hardcore trancer |
| quote: | Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
i read the synopsis a week or two ago. full of the repetitive fallacies that characterise the "truth" movement. |
When/if you get the chance watch the part 3 of the movie,I thought it was very informative.It definetly makes you look at the whole idea of a war in a different way which is very cool. :) |
|
|
| Omega_M |
| quote: | Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
yes i have. and yes, it is interesting. but something like this cannot stand up to the counter evidence. you know, bodies, wreckage, the destroyed lightposts on the approach vector, the hundreds of witnesses that saw the plane crash etc. or the very same blackbox they got from the pentagon ;)
has the accuracy of the blackbox been verified? i dont know enough about blackboxes and how accurate they are to make a judgement. i am however pretty good at plain old reading, and hundreds of witnesses cannot be wrong to such a degree. especially those that witnessed the flight passing within metres of their car ;) |
I didn't want to debate 911 in that thread :p
Anyways,
The quality of data should not be a matter of concern. Black boxes are meant to withstand heavy crashes like these. The government simulations were reconstructed from the same data. The question is, whether the members of this organization were qualified enough to read the flight data recorder. On the surface atleast, it looks like they may have done a good job. The government should respond and counter their claims with sound technical analysis. That is the only way to counter conspiracy theories : You respond to any fresh claim of conspiracy. I really don't care what people have seen and reported. People have seen UFOs and they will swear by it. I don't really know what to say about the derbies and stuff because half of the people claim to have seen them and the other half claims not to have seen much.
Hard engineering analysis > Witness testimonies. |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by Omega_M
I didn't want to debate 911 in that thread :p
Anyways,
The quality of data should not be a matter of concern. Black boxes are meant to withstand heavy crashes like these. The government simulations were reconstructed from the same data. The question is, whether the members of this organization were qualified enough to read the flight data recorder. On the surface atleast, it looks like they may have done a good job. The government should respond and counter their claims with sound technical analysis. That is the only way to counter conspiracy theories : You respond to any fresh claim of conspiracy. I really don't care what people have seen and reported. People have seen UFOs and they will swear by it. I don't really know what to say about the derbies and stuff because half of the people claim to have seen them and the other half claims not to have seen much. |
actually, there really is NO way to combat conspiracies. this is because they are born and thrive with arguments from doubt- which are pretty hard to undermine. basically because there will always be doubt in lots of situations, especially those that engender panic and misinformation on a day like sept 2001, those that want to can point at all sorts of things that cannot be explained. but not explaining does not equal conspiracy.
i have yet to see an explanation for the data recording evidence that explains the supposed anomalies. so i cant really make my own assessment yet. but i will point out that this particular black box coincidentally ends at the same time the plane didn't hit the pentagon. and was found in the debris at the pentagon. instead of JUST pointing at the discrepancies regarding the black box, id like to see a valid reason for this as well ;)
| quote: |
Hard engineering analysis > Witness testimonies. |
yes and no. people are familiar with passenger airlines. people are familiar with the pentagon. hundreds of people saw the passenger airline hit the pentagon. im willing to trust the judgement of hundreds of people in a situation where your average person can be expected to recognise the core facts.
this example is a multitude of difference from those witnesses that heard "explosions" around the WTCs (for obvious reasons). |
|
|
| hardcore trancer |
| quote: | Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
yes and no. people are familiar with passenger airlines. people are familiar with the pentagon. hundreds of people saw the passenger airline hit the pentagon. im willing to trust the judgement of hundreds of people in a situation where your average person can be expected to recognise the core facts. |
If thats the case then why cant the government provide us will all the security videos from the area from the day that pentagon got hit? I mean after all many people saw the plane crashing right?so why cant they share the videos with everyone? |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by hardcore trancer
If thats the case then why cant the government provide us will all the security videos from the area from the day that pentagon got hit? I mean after all many people saw the plane crashing right?so why cant they share the videos with everyone? |
i keep asking this question: can you provide me with evidence that the government does actually possess any footage of the plane hitting? people seem to make this assumption, but i am yet to see anything approaching fact that they do.
in any case, instead of arguing from a position of doubt, the CTers have much much bigger problems! like what happened to the plane, passengers, where the debris came from etc. id start there before making questionable assumptions about video footage ;) |
|
|
| hardcore trancer |
| quote: | Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
i keep asking this question: can you provide me with evidence that the government does actually possess any footage of the plane hitting? people seem to make this assumption, but i am yet to see anything approaching fact that they do. |
If they dont posses these footages then who has them? or are you sayind that those footages dont even exist to begin with?
| quote: | | in any case, instead of arguing from a position of doubt, the CTers have much much bigger problems! like what happened to the plane, passengers, where the debris came from etc. id start there before making questionable assumptions about video footage ;) |
Try watching that documantry movie that I posted here the other day.Iam not saying they are right or wrong but they do have a interesting arguments on some of the issues that you mentioned. |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by hardcore trancer
If they dont posses these footages then who has them? or are you sayind that those footages dont even exist to begin with? |
precisely. i have not seen an iota of evidence to suggest there is any more footage. and i have asked those in this thread to provide me with something and im still waiting...
| quote: | Originally posted by hardcore trancer
Try watching that documantry movie that I posted here the other day.Iam not saying they are right or wrong but they do have a interesting arguments on some of the issues that you mentioned. |
sorry mate, but after reading the synopsis im just not interested. how can i take anything in it seriously when it advertises itself with known fallacies? |
|
|
| colonelcrisp |
| I think the minnesota bridge collapse can hopefully shed some common sense on to some of you as to the nature of strucutral failure. While the NTSB hasnt begun their forensic analysis yet, my first hunch is that the structure lost stability due to the deck rehabilitation on the outer lanes of the freeway. Anyway, point being, that structure fell at "near freefall speeds" (i thought i should quote some of your rhetoric) and without any warning. Just goes to show you that because you have never seen it on tv before doesnt mean it cant happen. |
|
|
|
|
