return to tranceaddict TranceAddict Forums Archive > Other > Political Discussion / Debate

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 [284] 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 
Do you believe there is a U.S. government cover-up surrounding 9/11? (pg. 284)
View this Thread in Original format
culorut
quote:
there wasn't any molten steel (another fallacy), and even if there were, having it "molten" for two months after the collapses is not an indication of thermite. which you would know if you knew how thermite worked, but alas.


No molten metal? You were proven wrong about this point numerous times in this thread.

Joss Weatherby
quote:
Originally posted by culorut
No molten metal? You were proven wrong about this point numerous times in this thread.


You do realize the difficulty of working with thermite don't you?

Its not something you can just stick to the side of a building and have it do something. It requires a container to harness it and focus the energy.

Its also not a very controlled burn unless very carefully done. You are more than likely going to get ablation (throwing off slags of metal) of your cutting subject than you are some sort of molten pool of it. You will get pools of molten iron from thermite, but if this was used in the WTC I doubt you would find any traces of it in all that wreckage.

What you would find molten pools of is weaker metal alloys like those used in the rims of car wheels and other structures that do not require vast mechanical strength.

Have you ever seen the remnants of a car fire?

The idea that thermite was used is incredibly naive. If you talk to anyone who has ever worked with thermite you will know that its not very useful outside of very controlled situations (like welding, the opposite of what you say it was used for).
culorut
quote:
The pan-cake theory is the most widely recognized, the most widely researched and the one almost 100% to be true. It is also easily identifiable by the video of the collapse.


According to who? The official story states this but a huge percentage of the population says otherwise.

The buildings were demolished, I agree look at the video and watch the building disintegrate. Pancake? Yeah fuking right.

Joss Weatherby
quote:
Originally posted by culorut
According to who? The official story states this but a huge percentage of the population says otherwise.

The buildings were demolished, I agree look at the video and watch the building disintegrate. Pancake? Yeah fuking right.



Thats a horrible video to use as an example.

You can not see below the damaged area, and even then it still proves you wrong when the camera pulls back.

Look at how the debris shoot out to the side like that. Its obvious that the internal floor structure has started to collapse and that the exoskeleton, now having to support all of the weight by itself (normally the floors redistribute load back to the core) are exploding out to the side under the intense weight.

And what majority? You are in an extreme fringe minority.
culorut
quote:
You do realize the difficulty of working with thermite don't you?


I do realize the difficulty of working with it. The point is the molten metal was present as per the video. What is important is they left it out of the final reports without having to explain it.

Explain why molten metal was present under WTC7 if no plane crashed into that building?
culorut
NIST DENIES MOLTEN METAL


Joss Weatherby
quote:
Originally posted by culorut
I do realize the difficulty of working with it. The point is the molten metal was present as per the video. What is important is they left it out of the final reports without having to explain it.

Explain why molten metal was present under WTC7 if no plane crashed into that building?


What type of molten metal? There are so many different types of metals used in buildings, and just not in the structure, but in electrical conduit, water and waste pipes, metal fittings for staircases and decretive fixtures.

All of these depending on composition can melt under different temperatures.

You know why it wasn't in the report? IT DIDNT MATTER.

You know why there was molten metal in WTC7? There was a massive fire burning inside of it, there was a large transformer complex for Edison electric as well. Many exotic metals in those things. Lots of alloys that I am sure can melt even in a normal house fire.

Like I said, have you ever seen the remains of a car fire? There are huge pools of molten metal from the rims of the car and other parts. I have had a car burn in my parking area, a neighbor lady used the pools of molten metal in her art work.

Metal is not one element, its a type of element, with many different elements combined to make other types of metals. All of them have different physical properties.

To say "oh there was molten metal" is the same as to say that there was burnt wood at a house fire. It totally superfluous to anything that happened.
culorut
quote:
Originally posted by Joss Weatherby
Thats a horrible video to use as an example.



Actually the video tells a lot. The collapse when starting shows dust being thrown out right from the start. What is ejecting pulverized concrete outward before this so called gravity driven pancake collapse?
culorut
quote:
And what majority? You are in an extreme fringe minority.


Apparently you are the minority in this thread.



quote:
You know why it wasn't in the report? IT DIDNT MATTER.


In you're ignorant eyes yes. It was a crime scene.
Joss Weatherby
quote:
Originally posted by culorut
Actually the video tells a lot. The collapse when starting shows dust being thrown out right from the start. What is ejecting pulverized concrete outward before this so called gravity driven pancake collapse?



Thats what you guys seem to not understand is that its a two phase process.

The pan-caking is not even visible from the outside. What you see is the exoskeleton above the collapsed floors exploding outward under the pressure the remaining intact structure above is now exerting on it. The pan-caking floors are already 2 or 3 floors below what you are seeing on the outside of the structure.

The whole stability of the building relied on the floors connecting to the exoskeleton and the core. Pressure on the exoskeleton from the floors above was redistributed through the floor bracing to the more solid elevator shaft core in the middle. Its a really unstable design, but it works out well for the tenants because of the massive amount of floor space you can get.

culorut
quote:
You know why there was molten metal in WTC7? There was a massive fire burning inside of it,



Massive fires eh?

Krypton
quote:
Originally posted by culorut
Massive fires eh?



Nice, plagiarizing youtube videos. And you call us sheep LOL...:rolleyes:
CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 [284] 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 
Privacy Statement