Originally posted by noikeee
You misunderstood what I was saying. Of course Fabiano illegally touched it with his arms/hands, twice.
"I guess it compensates for the 2nd goal - absolutely spectacular, but this isn't handball."
Ahhh, got it. I thought you were saying it wasn't a handball.
quote:
Originally posted by noikeee
I meant handball the game:
Hang on. WTF? there's a game actually called handball? You just just ing pohtoshopped that together, didn't you? :toothless
The only game I know called handball (in my land) is commonly referred to as hand-egg. It's where pussies dress up in body armour in case they lose an eyelash while throwing an egg past fat people.
Renzo
At least this game had good sportsmanship.
Oh wait.
Moongoose
Handball FTW!
Lira
quote:
Originally posted by Lira
ps.: Hold on, Mike, give me a few minutes...
quote:
Originally posted by DJ RANN
Could I have an England one that says "we're going home, we're going home.....England's Going home"
Photoshop is acting up, sorry guys :(
SYSTEM-J
quote:
Originally posted by gehzumteufel
Dude, I went through all your posts since the argument started, and you didn't have more than 2. Go ing back and read.
Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear...
quote:
The droba incident could have been decided with the camera above, and one on each side following the ball.
There were multiple cameras at a brand new stadium, and it still took multiple repeats to come to a probable decision. But again, this kind of assertion does not invalidate the point. Look at the debate over Kaka's sending off tonight. Look at the way FIFA banned Eduardo for diving against Celtic and then took back the ban because after endless replays they couldn't make a decision. Look at Wayne Rooney's penalty against Arsenal, and how every ex-professional had a different opinion on it. I could keep providing examples all day and watch you scrabble around to try and come up with EASY calls for all of them. Stop wasting my ing time.
quote:
On your "point" of number two, you still ing fail. You still can't get your head out of your ass and READ my ing posts. Which made it VERY clear that each team would have two. READ THAT AGAIN. TWO challenges the whole ing game. Not 100 or some unending number.
Perfectly aware of that, doesn't change my point. It can still lead to minutes of stoppages just deciding on the decision, not counting play scratched off afterwards because there are not the natural breaks in the game to do this.
quote:
your edit: Dude, you did. In that you were talking about with getting nowhere professionally. And wouldn't a propensity be more than once? Considering it happened once and only once, how is it a propensity? Good god you're good at creating definitions out of your ass.
I didn't say a damn thing about "not being able to go back on my word". I said I have an inability to lie or compromise about something if I believe it to be wrong, even when it may benefit me. That's completely different to being unable to go back on myself. Christ, you really suck at this.
And hey - my mistake. I'm sure it only happened just that one time. Honest.
Lira
quote:
Originally posted by Renzo
At least this game had good sportsmanship.
Oh wait.
I remember I asked a friend if there had ever been a generalised fight during a World Cup match, and how it'd be entertaining to see it happen... and then it almost almost happened :p
I bet that Yaya guy can take two Brazilians with just one piledriver!
Moongoose
quote:
Originally posted by Lira
Photoshop is acting up, sorry guys :(
Oh no need to do it right now, still plenty of time before the match :D
noikeee
quote:
Originally posted by Lira
I remember I asked a friend if there had ever been a generalised fight during a World Cup match, and how it'd be entertaining to see it happen... and then it almost almost happened :p
I bet that Yaya guy can take two Brazilians with just one piledriver!
