return to tranceaddict TranceAddict Forums Archive > Main Forums > Chill Out Room

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 [175] 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 
FIFA World Cup 2010 in South Africa Discussion (pg. 175)
View this Thread in Original format
Schadenfreude
quote:
Originally posted by osterzone
Well that's what a lot of the people on here believe- that there's still "tradition" in football...or sports in general.

These kind of people make the same case against baseball getting instant replay. They compare baseball today to what it was back in 1910 and say they shouldn't ruin the tradition of the game.

Meanwhile, baseball is 99% different today than it was back then. There is no tradition left between all the steroids, HGH, new stadium dimensions, new bat technology, new training methods, new glove shapes, new uniform styles, new batting helmets, new batting gloves, new on-deck warmup methods...


everything but new fans...talk about a game in decline.
shaw
quote:
Originally posted by UWM
Well, you could limit the use of replay to allowing or disallowing goals involving only certain circumstances such as debated offsides, breach of the goal line, handball infractions, etc.


As much as the rest of the world makes fun of the NFL, they should take a look at how they handle replay. They really do a much better job than anybody else.
Trance-MB
I expect instant replay is going to be announce soon. More big shots like former dutch top referree Mario van der Ende, Guus Hiddink and Louis van Gaal want it to be used too.
Also Platini and Beckenbauer I heard. Pressure to use it now will get very high. Hiddink today even said Blatter should announce it tomorrow or leave.
ChemEnhanced
quote:
Originally posted by UWM
Well, you could limit the use of replay to allowing or disallowing goals involving only certain circumstances such as debated offsides, breach of the goal line, handball infractions, etc.


It does have to be limited but once you introduce instant replay then players, coaches and fans will all be asking why this and that are not part of instant replay. Questions like why isn't diving part of instant replay will definitely come into play at some point.
osterzone
Lol almost a fight for that horrible offsides call on the sidelines after the half. The refs had to come in there and break up a huge scrum between Mexico and Argentina players.

We need more of this- we need more tightening of the screws to get these football "traditionalists" to grow a pair of balls and get instant replay instated.
malek
This
quote:
Originally posted by UWM
Well, you could limit the use of replay to allowing or disallowing goals involving only certain circumstances such as debated offsides, breach of the goal line, handball infractions, etc.


And that

quote:
Originally posted by ChemEnhanced
I think the ideal move is to have another referee who watches the game on a monitor and can quickly review something while the play continues. It shouldn't take that long to review if a play was offside or if a goal did go in.


Yes at home we can make the call just after a few seconds. I can't see why a ref behind a dew monitors would do it worse or slower.
Ian
you can have goalline technology without anything else. It's quite simple, develop a system where there is a chip in the ball and it registers when crossing the line.
Schadenfreude
if they had instant replay, the most famous world cup goal in history would not have counted.
osterzone
quote:
Originally posted by Ian
you can have goalline technology without anything else. It's quite simple, develop a system where there is a chip in the ball and it registers when crossing the line.

Don't they already have that? It's just they have decided not to use it?
Ian
quote:
Originally posted by osterzone
Don't they already have that? It's just they have decided not to use it?


I believe a system for it has been developed. With the fourth official they could easily monitor it & call it back within seconds too.

yukii
UGHAHSDLKFJALSDFHLAHSG :mad: sooo pissed offff!!!!!!

1.) Mexico's goalie is the biggest ing dumbass.

2.) They put an *Italian* as the referee??? :rolleyes:

3.) The score should be 1-0 ffs! Did no one see how ing off side the first goal was?!! They even did a slow motion replay drawing the line. . .


I'm so angry.
Schadenfreude
quote:
Originally posted by Ian
you can have goalline technology without anything else. It's quite simple, develop a system where there is a chip in the ball and it registers when crossing the line.


or as simple as a ref with a blue tooth device and a guy upstairs watching every play.

i think it should only be used for goal line breaches and possible hand balls in the penalty area.
CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 [175] 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 
Privacy Statement