|
TOTA - APPLE iPHONE & iPAD & Mobile News Thread PT1 (CLOSED) (pg. 98)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| DigitalMP |
| quote: | Originally posted by DJ Mach X
YES GUY! Been looking for a free one! All the ones on AppWorld cost and ain't bothering with that! Need something simple and quick to help rifle through the CD books when DJ'n...
You know of any other ones? I know there are some expensive ones on AppWorld that will turn the entire screen into a flashlight making it all white (or whatever color red/blue/green) at the highest brightness... but looking for free ones. |
Here ya go...BerryTorch
I had it, but I like the bright white LED better. My old MotoQ had an awesome flashlight app that used the camera flash. I wish there was one for the Storm that did...
btw...BerryBuzz and BBSmartAlarms are well worth paying for, as is BerryWeather. There are theme that embed BerryWeather right in the home screen. |
|
|
| E2EK1EL |
| quote: | Originally posted by DigitalMP
Here ya go...BerryTorch
I had it, but I like the bright white LED better. My old MotoQ had an awesome flashlight app that used the camera flash. I wish there was one for the Storm that did...
btw...BerryBuzz and BBSmartAlarms are well worth paying for, as is BerryWeather. There are theme that embed BerryWeather right in the home screen. |
BIGUPz for supporting the BB crew |
|
|
| DigitalMP |
| quote: | Originally posted by E2EK1EL
BIGUPz for supporting the BB crew |
Holla.
BTW, the new BB OS 5.0 is going to have threaded SMS and flick-scrolling (for Storm), as well as native BBM 5.0 (I'm running the beta, which is tight). It should be out within a month or so. |
|
|
| DJ Mach X |
| quote: | Originally posted by chinamon
nothing beats a real flashlight though. i keep a small one on my belt whenever im working. great for grabbing security's attention if needed as well. |
Have one, had one, lose them, get a new one, break it, lose it....forget to bring it with me. But somehow ALWAYS manage to have my BlackBerry with me and never broke or lost that yet!
But yeah, this is just a good back up for when I forget the light or lose it! |
|
|
| E2EK1EL |
Yeah right ....
Why is Rogers pushing us to get 3.1? Got a txt and there's a recorded MSG when you call in. This update has caused so many batt damage and bricking units. |
|
|
| malek |
they send a message for every update.
Got a message for 3.01 too back then. |
|
|
| E2EK1EL |
| quote: | Originally posted by malek
they send a message for every update.
Got a message for 3.01 too back then. |
I've only seen it for this firmware ... |
|
|
| Abercrombie |
| How do you take a screen shot of your iphone again? |
|
|
| E2EK1EL |
| Power+Home <--- Read the manual pls |
|
|
| E2EK1EL |
Google says Phil Schiller himself rejected Google Voice from the App Store
It was always curious that Google's response to the FCC inquiry about Google Voice and the App Store had been redacted, but now we're starting to see why -- El Goog and the FCC have just released the full text of the letter, and it flatly contradicts Apple's take on the matter. If you'll remember, Apple claimed that while Google Voice hadn't been approved, it also hadn't been rejected, and that its status was in limbo while the folks in Cupertino "studied" the matter. Not so, says El Goog: according to its letter, Phil Schiller himself told Google that GV had been rejected on July 7 for duplication of functionality, following a similar conversation on April 10th during which Schiller rejected Google Latitude in part because it might "offer new features not present on the preloaded maps application." Yeah, that's a huge discrepancy, and it makes Apple's version seem even more divorced from reality that it already is. Things are starting to heat up -- we'll see what the FCC makes of all this.
Update: And here we go -- Apple just pinged us to say the following: "We do not agree with all of the statements made by Google in their FCC letter. Apple has not rejected the Google Voice application and we continue to discuss it with Google."
Update 2: So we've been thinking about it, and here's our question -- if Apple didn't reject GV, and is still studying it, what exactly did Phil Schiller say to Google to make them think it had been rejected? The difference between "rejected" and "on hold pending further discussion" isn't a subtle one, and Google clearly thought GV had been explicitly rejected. For whatever it's worth, reports of GV's "rejection" are how this whole mess got started, so either this is all one huge misunderstanding, or someone here isn't telling the entire truth |
|
|
| Abercrombie |
| quote: | Originally posted by E2EK1EL
Power+Home <--- Read the manual pls |
I got it used :P |
|
|
|
|
