For some reason I always expect you to be much stronger than you actually are.
Fledz
Jacknife situps :conf:
Silky Johnson
What do you mean? Like I should be lifting heavier weight? I'm pretty small. My legs are quite strong, but I wouldn't risk lifting too much more weight with just free weights.
Silky Johnson
quote:
Originally posted by Fledz
Jacknife situps :conf:
edit: I don't go all the way back flat though. I keep my feet and hands just off the ground.
Fledz
Oh right, that. Not bad. I prefer weighted situps though, working more slowly.
Love the plank with a swiss ball :gsmile:
Silky Johnson
Yeah I'm gonna attempt a plank variation where you extend out from the bench (feet on the bench, hands on the floor) and walk yourself around the bench with your hands. 3 times. I *think* I should be able to manage, though it might prove difficult to hold plank while also adding the extra breathing effort. We'll see. :o
Ted Promo
Doing dick stretches all day respect
Nrg2Nfinit
quote:
Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
It actually does not matter what foods you eat when creating a calorific deficit. In my final year of university I lost about 20lbs in three months despite eating non-stop junk food just because I had a calorific deficit. You can live on fried chicken and whiskey and you'll still lose weight if you have a deficit. And eggs are not "high calorie food". Even eating seven whole eggs a day will only give you around 560 calories, which is not a deal breaker.
The argument isn't anywhere near this simple, anyway. You can lose weight indiscriminately simply by creating a deficit, but the real challenge of weight loss is losing bodyfat while maintaining lean muscle mass. That's more complex - it's not just what you eat but how regularly you eat, the size of the meals and the proportional nutritional composition of each meal.
are you ting me?
how does it not matter if fats are 9 kcal?
so you eat 500 g of carbs or you eat 500 g of fats.. which one is going to create more of a surplus?
thus consuming foods with high fat content will lead to a higher caloric surplus
simple equation here
so you cant say that eating less high fat foods is not going to help with weightloss.
Nrg2Nfinit
quote:
Originally posted by Fledz
Seriously. I don't even understand what he's trying to argue about any more :wtf:
perhaps if you stopped misinforming people and read what i wrote it could help.
telling people:
A) cholesterol intake wont effect your cholesterol levels....
B) eating less fatty foods won't help with weightloss....
are two statements taken at face value which are grossly incorrect.
SYSTEM-J
quote:
Originally posted by Nrg2Nfinit
so you eat 500 g of carbs or you eat 500 g of fats.. which one is going to create more of a surplus?
Nobody calculates their diet in that way, you complete cretin. Look at the nutritional information of any food and the calories are the first ing number. You work out your calorific requirement (there are simple and accurate equations) and you work out the calories in the food you eat in a day. Just keep the second number lower than the first number and you can live on KFC and you will lose weight. I have done it.
You really are outstandingly stupid, Karim.
Nrg2Nfinit
quote:
Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
Nobody calculates their diet in that way, you complete cretin. Look at the nutritional information of any food and the calories are the first ing number. You work out your calorific requirement (there are simple and accurate equations) and you work out the calories in the food you eat in a day. Just keep the second number lower than the first number and you can live on KFC and you will lose weight. I have done it.
You really are outstandingly stupid, Karim.
and how is this relevant at all to what i am saying.
If you knew how to read, all i am saying is that fats contain more calories then carbs and proteins. If you eat less fats you will consume less calories.
for the 5000000th time dumbass
Nrg2Nfinit
theres probably a good reason as to why you are on welfare.. i think ive figured it out.