return to tranceaddict TranceAddict Forums Archive > Main Forums > Chill Out Room

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 [582] 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 
Workout Thread IV (pg. 582)
View this Thread in Original format
Fledz
quote:
Originally posted by Nrg2Nfinit
to illustrate the point that fats contain more then double the calories of proteins and carbs, yet you say that not avoiding them isnt helpfull to reducing your caloric intake.

Where did I say this?
Nrg2Nfinit
quote:
Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
I just ing did. Do you want me to copy-paste my last post over and over while you backtrack further and change what you said? Because that's the only way this discussion is going.


i thought i answered this over and over again, but it seems like your not reading what i wrote


quote:

Don't play the victim now, son. You've thrown plenty of insults in this argument, so you merely look like a little bitch who can dish it, but won't take it:



2 against one in a barrage of ad hominem attacks.. i feel like you're 2 negros with a snake trying to force it up my ass.

quote:


"oh and one more thing to fill your devoid brain"
"i spoonfed you, exactly what you're accustomed to."
"theres probably a good reason as to why you are on welfare.. i think ive figured it out."
"dumbass"


for the record, those were all directed at you after you first started with the ad hominem attacks genius.
Fledz
quote:
Originally posted by Nrg2Nfinit
1) cholesterol intake will effect cholesterol levels over time

2) reducing fatty food intake is helpfull in weightloss (and an easier way to create a calorie deficit and feel satiated).

1) May. MAY. Positively or negatively? Should people focus on it though? No, because there are better ways to reduce cholesterol than worrying about the cholesterol levels in a food.

2) Of course it is, for s sake. Everybody knows that. Carbs, sugar and salt are an even better way. "Fat free" foods is the worst marketing bull to happen in the last 20 years because it makes people (like yourself) seem to think that cutting fat from food will make them lose all that fat, when in fact it's a lot more complicated.


I fail to see how any of this proves that egg yolks are bad for you...
Nrg2Nfinit
quote:
Originally posted by Fledz
Where did I say this?


quote:
Originally posted by Fledz

Also ziptnf - If you're trying to lose weight, then carbohydrates and sugar are what you should be targeting, not fats . It's quite simple, if you burn off more kilojoules than you take in, you lose weight. More muscle mass also increases your resting metabolism. In practice it's quite straight forward. Focusing on fats and the amount of cholesterol will get you nowhere fast.
Fledz
Read my post above. I said to focus on carbs and sugar (salt too) because it's more efficient, rather than just fats. Your argument is ing awful :stongue:
Nrg2Nfinit
quote:
Originally posted by Fledz
1) May. MAY. Positively or negatively? Should people focus on it though? No, because there are better ways to reduce cholesterol than worrying about the cholesterol levels in a food.


if you have high cholesterol, you should lower your cholesterol intake through foods especially those with high ldl. I know because i've gone through it and been told to by a General practitioner and a gastroenterologists.

It takes a significant amount of time to do so, but it helps rather then keeping the cholesterol intake the same

quote:



I fail to see how any of this proves that egg yolks are bad for you...


perhaps if you read my post about ldl cholesterol in eggs, maybe that answers the quesiton for you.

27% of the cholesterol in eggs is ldl cholesterol. If you consume a large amount of eggs, your ldl choleserol per day will increase and so will your cholesterol levels over time. This isnt rocket science here.
Nrg2Nfinit
quote:
Originally posted by Fledz
Read my post above. I said to focus on carbs and sugar (salt too) because it's more efficient, rather than just fats. Your argument is ing awful :stongue:


how is it more efficient when fats contain more than double the amount of calories than carbs and proteins?
Silky Johnson
Excess sugar gets stored as fat. If you cut out carbs and sugar, your body will learn to use fat more readily as an energy source. And don't forget about the connection between blood glucose and metabolism. Cutting out sugar and bad carbs will lead to more stable blood glucose levels, which will encourage a healthier metabolism. If you focus just on fat, you're basically ignoring what's more important to weight control in the long run.
Nrg2Nfinit
quote:
Originally posted by Miss Pie
Excess sugar gets stored as fat. If you cut out carbs and sugar, your body will learn to use fat more readily as an energy source. And don't forget about the connection between blood glucose and metabolism. Cutting out sugar and bad carbs will lead to more stable blood glucose levels, which will encourage a healthier metabolism. If you focus just on fat, you're basically ignoring what's more important to weight control in the long run.



Understandable, and its a good and valid point that you raise. But, if you're creaiting a calorie deficit in the first place by eliminating fatty foods, the sugars wont get stored as fats (since their calories will be used in your bodies activities.

the fact that fatty foods are calorie landminds should be indicative that avoiding them will help in weight loss. (my argument here is yes they are part of the big picture)


You don't give a fat person 1 tripple thick milkshake a day for their diet. It would be more usefull to give them 2 kilos of celery as to satiate them lol.

I hope my point is illustrated here with this harsh contrast.
Silky Johnson
Nobody is arguing that cutting out fat helps in weight loss. We're saying that making fats THE FOCUS of weight loss is inefficient and stupid.

Fledz
quote:
Originally posted by Miss Pie
Nobody is arguing that cutting out fat helps in weight loss. We're saying that making fats THE FOCUS of weight loss is inefficient and stupid.























:mad:
Nrg2Nfinit
cutting out fats is the easiest way to create a caloric deficit

thus cutting out fats is important as you say AND THUS IT HAS TO BE an EFFICIENT focus of weight loss


if you reduce, out of three given components 1 which gives you more then double the input of the two others, i call that efficient.


this is simple math here 1+1 = 2
CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 [582] 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 
Privacy Statement